HOLD THE ELECTIONS IN IRAQ, SUNNIS OR NO SUNNIS

Charles Krauthammer has it right about Iraq...

IN 1864, 11 of the 36 United States did not participate in the Presidential election. Was Lincoln’s election therefore illegitimate? In 1868, three years after the security situation had, shall we say, stabilized, three states (not insignificant ones: Texas, Virginia and Mississippi) did not participate in the election. Was Grant’s election illegitimate? There has been much talk that if the Iraqi election is held and some Sunni Arab provinces (perhaps 3 of the 18) do not participate, the election will be illegitimate. Nonsense. The election should be held. It should be open to everyone. If Iraq’s Sunni Arabs — barely 20 percent of the population — decide they cannot abide giving up their 80 years of minority rule, ending with 30 years of Saddam’s atrocious tyranny, then tough luck.

I absolutely agree. Perhaps the specter of the Shiites and the Kurds making decisions without them will get reasonable Sunni leaders to make a greater effort to curb the Sunni-based insurgency. Read the whole thing, as they say in the blogosphere.