Google

Saturday, November 05, 2005

TO THE BARRICADES II

Eleanor Clift proves the point I made in Thursday's post (scroll down). If George W. Bush DELIBERATELY misled the American people about WMDs in Iraq to justify going to war, then it logically follows that he must be impeached.

Democrats feel emboldened, and they’re dropping the euphemisms. They’re saying straight out that the president and his administration lied and manufactured evidence to take the country to war. The logical extension of such an explosive charge would be impeachment, says Marshall Wittmann, a senior fellow at the Democratic Leadership Council, though Wittmann doesn’t personally advocate this strategy. “It’s the highest crime and misdemeanor one can think of, the case that they maliciously did this, and it obliges Democrats [who backed the war] to say they cast the wrong vote.” Wittmann is sharply critical of the administration’s performance in Iraq, but he supported the invasion and thinks Democrats would be ill-advised to drag the country into impeachment proceedings.

Impeachment seems a bridge too far, but when the question was posed to a former senior member of the law-enforcement community, he didn’t dismiss it out of hand. “Not at this stage,” he told NEWSWEEK, “but there are three more years left to this administration, and I can see it unraveling.”

The more we learn about the secretive White House Iraq Group (WHIG) and the role of Vice President Dick Cheney in pressing his dark views on the country, the likelier it is that the administration will be found culpable for exaggerating the threat Saddam Hussein posed in its zeal to go to war. If the Democrats win back the House in the ’06 election, Michigan Democrat John Conyers will chair the House Judiciary committee. On the day the Scooter Libby indictments were handed down, Conyers invoked the language of Watergate: “What did the president and the vice president know, and when did they know it?” If the political tables turn, impeachment may not be so far-fetched after all.

This is just the sort of thinking that led to the GOP effort to impeach President Clinton, an effort that gained the Republicans absolutely nothing in terms of political momentum.

1 Comments:

At 7:48 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

How can anyone compare the clinton impeachment with what bush is suspected of. There is abs9olutely no comparision.We democracts have to argue reality and dismiss the incidentals. We have get the media to acknowledge the reality of our situation expose the lies that are being presented to us . Where is the media outrage? Wake up america or our country is going to go the way of the roman empire.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home